Your numberSee this page in your own figures: industry, spend and the estimated leak.Run the estimator →

Data · all 74, ranked by value

Marketing audit findings: all 74, ranked by value.

Across 74 published case highlights the lower median annual figure is $58,000, the range runs $31k to $134k, and 51 cases publish at least $50k. Every figure comes from a published, senior reviewed case study and links to it.

  • Reviewed Sep 2026
  • 74 findings
  • CSV of every row
  • Median finding $58k a year across 74 audits

Source: the 74 published case studies, one highlight figure each; the benchmark carries the prevalence figures.

Cite this figureAcross 74 published MarginFix marketing audits the lower median highlight finding is $58k a year; the published figures run from $31k to $134k. MarginFix, marginfix.ai/findings/
01

Median finding by industry

One published annual highlight figure per case, the lower median per industry. Open an industry for its cases and the scope of an audit there.

IndustryAuditsLower median finding
Fintech7 audits$83k a year
Marketplace7 audits$66k a year
Pharma9 audits$64k a year
Manufacturing10 audits$64k a year
Retail8 audits$54k a year
DTC / Ecommerce10 audits$53k a year
B2B SaaS8 audits$52k a year
Subscription7 audits$51k a year
Services8 audits$47k a year
02

What a marketing audit finds: the five leak patterns

The benchmark reports these five patterns, defined in depth here. Percentages are owner approved published figures. Audit level flags, eligible counts and common periods are unavailable here; categories may overlap, so do not sum percentages or infer counts. They cannot be reconstructed from the highlight values on this page.

Leak patternPrevalenceWhat it is
Non-incremental paid68%Ad budget buying conversions the business would have won anyway; classically, branded search against customers already intending to purchase.
Attribution inflation54%Several platforms each claim the same sale, so attributed revenue sums to more than 100% of actual and over funds whichever channel claims most aggressively.
Mispriced offers47%Offers, bundles and discounts that sell below true contribution once shipping, returns, fees and payment costs are counted.
Retention leaks41%Solvable churn: failed payment dunning, renewal drop off and cancellation flows that quietly erase acquisition gains.
Discount habits33%Reflexive promo codes and standing discounts that give margin away to buyers who would have paid full price.
03

How big is a typical finding?

One published annual highlight figure per case, grouped by its data category. The category is not proof of implementation or realization; follow the case link for its specific outcome.

Outcome typeAuditsLower median value
Revenue gain36 audits$57k a year
Cost save26 audits$64k a year
Efficiency12 audits$57k a year
04

All 74 findings, ranked by annual value

Sorted from the highest published annual figure to the lowest. Every row opens its case. On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways for industry, type and timing.

Showing all 74 findings

#FindingIndustryTypeValue a yearTime
1Scaling spend was hiding a $134k annual margin leak
Open the case
DTC / EcommerceRevenue gain$134,0006 days
2Volume rebates were paid on orders that never hit the tierManufacturingCost save$118,0007 days
3Incentive spend acquired users who never fundedFintechCost save$96,0007 days
4Late quarter discounting was quietly eroding ACV marginB2B SaaSRevenue gain$92,0007 days
5Acquisition ignored default rate by channelFintechEfficiency$88,0007 days
6Congress and KOL sponsorship showed no measurable returnPharmaCost save$88,0007 days
7Online ads were paying for in store demandRetailCost save$88,0007 days
8Interchange margin varied wildly by acquisition channelFintechRevenue gain$83,0007 days
9Referral rewards were paid on self referred and gamed volumeFintechCost save$83,0007 days
10CAC looked fine, until we split it by cohortMarketplaceEfficiency$82,0007 days
11A surcharge lag was never passed into customer contractsManufacturingRevenue gain$79,0007 days
12Unbranded search was paying for traffic the brand site already wonPharmaCost save$78,0007 days
13A $1.2M ad budget hid a 40% wasted impression rateB2B SaaSCost save$74,0007 days
14Courier incentives overlapped organic supply in dense zonesMarketplaceCost save$74,0007 days
15DTC ads were cannibalizing higher margin retailManufacturingEfficiency$73,0007 days
16Broker commissions were flat across very different loss ratiosFintechRevenue gain$72,0007 days
17Rising freight never reached the price listManufacturingRevenue gain$72,0007 days
18Loyalty points cost more than the repeat they droveRetailCost save$71,0007 days
19Patient acquisition spend ran above what reimbursement paidPharmaCost save$71,0007 days
20A billing config gap left usage overages unchargedB2B SaaSRevenue gain$70,0006 days
21Dealer co-op funds were subsidizing competitors’ leadsManufacturingCost save$69,0007 days
22Returns processing cost was missing from channel economicsRetailCost save$69,0007 days
23A discount habit was training the best customers to waitDTC / EcommerceRevenue gain$68,0006 days
24The cheapest leads were the most expensive customersB2B SaaSBudget optimized$68,0006 days
25Buyer subsidies outran the repeat GMV they were meant to unlockMarketplaceEfficiency$66,0007 days
26Paid search was bidding on supply the platform already ranked forMarketplaceCost save$66,0006 days
27Detailing and sample spend produced no prescribing liftPharmaCost save$64,0007 days
28Distributor margin was set once and never revisitedManufacturingRevenue gain$64,0006 days
29HCP and patient budgets were optimized in isolationPharmaCost save$64,0006 days
30Seat true ups were underbilled as accounts grewSubscriptionRevenue gain$63,0006 days
31Supply side incentives outlived their purposeMarketplaceCost save$63,0006 days
32Intake was dropping a third of qualified callsServicesRevenue gain$62,0006 days
33FBA fees and returns had overtaken the margin on the hero ASINsDTC / EcommerceRevenue gain$61,0006 days
34Free planning support cost more than small accounts earnedFintechRevenue gain$61,0006 days
35Seasonal media weight ignored when the category actually convertedPharmaEfficiency$60,0007 days
36Bestsellers were priced below their true landed costDTC / EcommerceRevenue gain$59,0006 days
37Free assembly and delivery were bundled below cost on big ticket linesRetailRevenue gain$58,0006 days
38Media ran outside the eligible population windowsPharmaCost save$58,0006 days
39Promotional fee waivers were never switched offMarketplaceRevenue gain$58,0006 days
40Annual plans were discounted below their retention valueSubscriptionRevenue gain$57,0006 days
41CAC payback was twice what the board believedFintechEfficiency$57,0006 days
42Configurator upsells were discounted below their costManufacturingRevenue gain$57,0006 days
43Small order handling cost exceeded the margin on the orderManufacturingRevenue gain$57,0006 days
44Subscription churn was masked by aggressive new trial spendDTC / EcommerceEfficiency$55,0007 days
45Click and collect was subsidizing the delivery it replacedRetailRevenue gain$54,0006 days
46Retainers were priced below delivery costServicesRevenue gain$54,0007 days
47The agency’s ‘winning’ campaign was the biggest loserDTC / EcommerceCost save$53,0007 days
48Fixed fee packages were scoped below the hours they consumedServicesRevenue gain$52,0006 days
49Free tier support cost more than the plan earnedB2B SaaSRevenue gain$52,0006 days
50Weak payment recovery was leaking revenue as involuntary churnSubscriptionRevenue gain$52,0005 days
51Growth spend was outrunning retentionSubscriptionEfficiency$51,0005 days
52Markdown timing was leaving margin on the shelfRetailRevenue gain$49,0006 days
53Retail vet channel discounts were set below marginPharmaRevenue gain$49,0006 days
54Dead SKUs tied up the margin in slow catalog linesManufacturingRevenue gain$48,0005 days
55Free shipping was quietly deleting the margin on every third orderDTC / EcommerceRevenue gain$47,0005 days
56Lead spend ignored close rate by sourceServicesEfficiency$47,0005 days
57Partner referral fees were paid on deals sales had sourced directlyB2B SaaSCost save$47,0006 days
58The pause and skip flow was leaking straight to cancellationSubscriptionRevenue gain$47,0006 days
59Travel and onboarding time was going unbilledServicesRevenue gain$47,0006 days
60Affiliate commissions were being paid on sales the brand already ownedDTC / EcommerceCost save$44,0005 days
61Quoting ignored callback and warranty costServicesRevenue gain$44,0005 days
62Subscription acquisition ignored regulatory driven churnPharmaEfficiency$44,0006 days
63Take rate was leaking through unmanaged refundsMarketplaceRevenue gain$44,0007 days
64Paid was subsidizing a channel sales already ownedB2B SaaSBudget redeployed$41,0005 days
65Shipping tiers didn’t match cohort valueSubscriptionRevenue gain$41,0006 days
66Trade show spend had no attributable pipelineManufacturingCost save$41,0006 days
67Vendor promo funding wasn’t covering the margin given awayRetailRevenue gain$41,0005 days
68Every location bought the same keywords against each otherServicesCost save$39,0005 days
69Job board spend was spread evenly regardless of fill rateServicesEfficiency$39,0006 days
70Bundles were cannibalizing full price hero SKUsDTC / EcommerceRevenue gain$38,0005 days
71Payment fees varied by tender and went unmanagedRetailRevenue gain$38,0005 days
72Content spend had no path to revenueB2B SaaSCost save$36,0007 days
73Win back campaigns were rebuying customers who’d have returned freeSubscriptionCost save$33,0005 days
74Retargeting was paid twice for the same customerDTC / EcommerceCost save$31,0005 days
05

Methodology

The population is the 74 published case studies, with one selected highlight figure per case. It is not a representative sample of all SMBs or a total of every finding in each audit. A lower median is the middle value after sorting, using the lower of the two middle values for an even count. Published annual figures include different outcome types; they are not all collected cash, profit or recurring savings. Case publication dates do not establish common observation, implementation or recovery periods; use each case for its supported timing and outcome. The sum of the 74 figures is $4,513,000; the largest single figure is $134,000 and the smallest $31,000. The 2026 SMB Marketing Margin Benchmark includes a summary CSV and separate limitations for spend ratios and prevalence. The edition year does not establish when the audits or outcomes were measured.

06

Marketing audit findings FAQ

What does a marketing audit find?

The published benchmark lists non incremental paid spend (68%), attribution inflation (54%), mispriced offers (47%), retention leaks (41%) and discount habits (33%). Eligible counts and audit level flags are not supplied; categories may overlap. Separately, the lower median annual highlight figure across the 74 published cases is $58,000.

What is the most common marketing audit finding?

Non incremental paid spend has the highest published prevalence figure, 68%. It means spend credited with conversions the business would have won anyway. The published case highlights do not provide eligible counts or audit level flags to independently reconstruct this percentage.

How much is a typical marketing audit finding worth?

The lower median published annual highlight figure across 74 cases is $58,000, with a range of $31k to $134k. These figures mix outcome types and measurement periods. They do not establish typical realized profit or cash recovery.

Your row is not in this table yet.

Find your number in 5 to 7 working days, every finding tied to your own data. $10k to $50k of findings, or your money back.

Fixed fee. No retainer. NDA first.