Your numberSee this page in your own figures: industry, spend and the estimated leak.Run the estimator →

Data · all 74, ranked by value

Marketing audit findings: all 74, ranked by value.

Across 74 published case highlights the lower median annual figure is $58,000, the range runs $31k to $134k, and 51 cases publish at least $50k. Every figure comes from a published, senior reviewed case study and links to it.

  • 74 findings
  • CSV of every row
  • Median finding $58k a year across 74 audits

Source: the 74 published case studies, one highlight figure each; the benchmark carries the prevalence figures.

Cite this figureAcross 74 published MarginFix marketing audits the lower median highlight finding is $58k a year; the published figures run from $31k to $134k. MarginFix, marginfix.ai/findings/
01

Median finding by industry

One published annual highlight figure per case, the lower median per industry. Open an industry for its cases and the scope of an audit there.

IndustryAuditsLower median finding
Fintech7 audits$83k a year
Marketplace7 audits$66k a year
Pharma9 audits$64k a year
Manufacturing10 audits$64k a year
Retail8 audits$54k a year
DTC / Ecommerce10 audits$53k a year
B2B SaaS8 audits$52k a year
Subscription7 audits$51k a year
Services8 audits$47k a year
02

What a marketing audit finds, by prevalence

The benchmark reports these five patterns, defined in depth here. Percentages are owner approved published figures. Audit level flags, eligible counts and common periods are unavailable here; categories may overlap, so do not sum percentages or infer counts. They cannot be reconstructed from the highlight values on this page.

Leak patternPrevalenceWhat it is
Non incremental paid68%Ad budget buying conversions the business would have won anyway; classically, branded search against customers already intending to purchase.
Attribution inflation54%Several platforms each claim the same sale, so attributed revenue sums to more than 100% of actual and over funds whichever channel claims most aggressively.
Mispriced offers47%Offers, bundles and discounts that sell below true contribution once shipping, returns, fees and payment costs are counted.
Retention leaks41%Solvable churn: failed payment dunning, renewal drop off and cancellation flows that quietly erase acquisition gains.
Discount habits34%Reflexive promo codes and standing discounts that give margin away to buyers who would have paid full price.
03

How big is a typical finding?

One published annual highlight figure per case, grouped by its data category. The category is not proof of implementation or realization; follow the case link for its specific outcome.

Outcome typeAuditsLower median value
Revenue gain36 audits$57k a year
Cost save26 audits$64k a year
Efficiency12 audits$57k a year
04

All 74 findings, ranked by annual value

Sorted from the highest published annual figure to the lowest. Every row opens its case. On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways for industry, type and timing.

Showing all 74 findings

#FindingValue a yearIndustryTypeTime
1Scaling prospecting spend was losing money on every sale
Open the case
$134,000DTC / EcommerceRevenue gain6 days
2Volume rebates were paid on orders that never hit the tier$118,000ManufacturingCost save7 days
3Incentive spend acquired users who never funded$96,000FintechCost save7 days
4Late quarter discounting was quietly eroding ACV margin$92,000B2B SaaSRevenue gain7 days
5Acquisition ignored default rate by channel$88,000FintechEfficiency7 days
6Congress and KOL sponsorship showed no measurable return$88,000PharmaBudget redirected7 days
7Online ads were paying for in store demand$88,000RetailCost save7 days
8Interchange margin varied wildly by acquisition channel$83,000FintechRevenue gain7 days
9Referral rewards were paid on self referred and gamed volume$83,000FintechCost save7 days
10CAC looked fine, until we split it by cohort$82,000MarketplaceEfficiency7 days
11A surcharge lag was never passed into customer contracts$79,000ManufacturingRevenue gain7 days
12Unbranded search was paying for traffic the brand site already won$78,000PharmaCost save7 days
13A $1.2M ad budget hid a 40% wasted impression rate$74,000B2B SaaSCost save7 days
14Courier incentives overlapped organic supply in dense zones$74,000MarketplaceCost save7 days
15DTC ads were cannibalizing higher margin retail$73,000ManufacturingEfficiency7 days
16Broker commissions were flat across very different loss ratios$72,000FintechRevenue gain7 days
17Rising freight never reached the price list$72,000ManufacturingRevenue gain7 days
18Loyalty points cost more than the repeat they drove$71,000RetailCost save7 days
19Patient acquisition spend ran above what reimbursement paid$71,000PharmaCost save7 days
20A billing config gap left usage overages uncharged$70,000B2B SaaSRevenue gain6 days
21Dealer cooperative funds were subsidizing competitors’ leads$69,000ManufacturingCost save7 days
22Returns processing cost was missing from channel economics$69,000RetailReturns cost reallocated7 days
23A discount habit was training the best customers to wait$68,000DTC / EcommerceRevenue gain6 days
24The cheapest leads were the most expensive customers$68,000B2B SaaSBudget optimized6 days
25Buyer subsidies outran the repeat GMV they were meant to unlock$66,000MarketplaceEfficiency7 days
26Paid search was bidding on supply the platform already ranked for$66,000MarketplaceCost save6 days
27Detailing and sample spend produced no prescribing lift$64,000PharmaCost save7 days
28Distributor margin was set once and never revisited$64,000ManufacturingRevenue gain6 days
29HCP and patient budgets were optimized in isolation$64,000PharmaCost save6 days
30Seat true ups were underbilled as accounts grew$63,000SubscriptionRevenue gain6 days
31Supply side incentives outlived their purpose$63,000MarketplaceCost save6 days
32Intake was dropping a third of qualified calls$62,000ServicesRevenue gain6 days
33FBA fees and returns had overtaken the margin on the hero ASINs$61,000DTC / EcommerceRevenue gain6 days
34Free planning support cost more than small accounts earned$61,000FintechRevenue gain6 days
35Seasonal media weight ignored when the category actually converted$60,000PharmaEfficiency7 days
36Bestsellers were priced below their true landed cost$59,000DTC / EcommerceRevenue gain6 days
37Free assembly and delivery were bundled below cost on big ticket lines$58,000RetailRevenue gain6 days
38Media ran outside the eligible population windows$58,000PharmaCost save6 days
39Promotional fee waivers were never switched off$58,000MarketplaceRevenue gain6 days
40Annual plans were discounted below their retention value$57,000SubscriptionRevenue gain6 days
41CAC payback was twice what the board believed$57,000FintechEfficiency6 days
42Configurator upsells were discounted below their cost$57,000ManufacturingRevenue gain6 days
43Small order handling cost exceeded the margin on the order$57,000ManufacturingRevenue gain6 days
44Subscription churn was masked by aggressive new trial spend$55,000DTC / EcommerceEfficiency7 days
45Click and collect was subsidizing the delivery it replaced$54,000RetailRevenue gain6 days
46Retainers were priced below delivery cost$54,000ServicesRevenue gain7 days
47The agency’s ‘winning’ campaign was the biggest loser$53,000DTC / EcommerceCost save7 days
48Fixed fee packages were scoped below the hours they consumed$52,000ServicesRevenue gain6 days
49Free tier support cost more than the plan earned$52,000B2B SaaSRevenue gain6 days
50Weak payment recovery was leaking revenue as involuntary churn$52,000SubscriptionRevenue gain5 days
51Growth spend was outrunning retention$51,000SubscriptionEfficiency5 days
52Markdown timing was leaving margin on the shelf$49,000RetailRevenue gain6 days
53Retail vet channel discounts were set below margin$49,000PharmaRevenue gain6 days
54Dead SKUs tied up the margin in slow catalog lines$48,000ManufacturingRevenue gain5 days
55Free shipping was quietly deleting the margin on every third order$47,000DTC / EcommerceRevenue gain5 days
56Lead spend ignored close rate by source$47,000ServicesEfficiency5 days
57Partner referral fees were paid on deals sales had sourced directly$47,000B2B SaaSCost save6 days
58The pause and skip flow was leaking straight to cancellation$47,000SubscriptionRevenue gain6 days
59Travel and onboarding time was going unbilled$47,000ServicesRevenue gain6 days
60Affiliate commissions were being paid on sales the brand already owned$44,000DTC / EcommerceCost save5 days
61Quoting ignored callback and warranty cost$44,000ServicesRevenue gain5 days
62Subscription acquisition ignored regulatory driven churn$44,000PharmaEfficiency6 days
63Take rate was leaking through unmanaged refunds$44,000MarketplaceRevenue gain7 days
64Paid was subsidizing a channel sales already owned$41,000B2B SaaSBudget redeployed5 days
65Shipping tiers didn’t match cohort value$41,000SubscriptionRevenue gain6 days
66Trade show spend had no attributable pipeline$41,000ManufacturingCost save6 days
67Vendor promo funding wasn’t covering the margin given away$41,000RetailRevenue gain5 days
68Every location bought the same keywords against each other$39,000ServicesCost save5 days
69Job board spend was spread evenly regardless of fill rate$39,000ServicesEfficiency6 days
70Bundles were cannibalizing full price hero SKUs$38,000DTC / EcommerceRevenue gain5 days
71Payment fees varied by tender and went unmanaged$38,000RetailRevenue gain5 days
72Content spend had no path to revenue$36,000B2B SaaSCost save7 days
73Winback campaigns were rebuying customers who’d have returned free$33,000SubscriptionCost save5 days
74Retargeting was paid twice for the same customer$31,000DTC / EcommerceCost save5 days
05

Methodology

The population is the 74 published case studies, with one selected highlight figure per case. It is not a representative sample of all SMBs or a total of every finding in each audit. A lower median is the middle value after sorting, using the lower of the two middle values for an even count. Published annual figures include different outcome types; they are not all collected cash, profit or recurring savings. Case publication dates do not establish common observation, implementation or recovery periods; use each case for its supported timing and outcome. The sum of the 74 figures is $4,513,000; the largest single figure is $134,000 and the smallest $31,000. The 2026 SMB Marketing Margin Benchmark includes a summary CSV and separate limitations for spend ratios and prevalence. The edition year does not establish when the audits or outcomes were measured.

06

Marketing audit findings FAQ

What does a marketing audit find?

The published benchmark lists non incremental paid spend (68%), attribution inflation (54%), mispriced offers (47%), retention leaks (41%) and discount habits (34%). Eligible counts and audit level flags are not supplied; categories may overlap. Separately, the lower median annual highlight figure across the 74 published cases is $58,000.

What is the most common marketing audit finding?

Non incremental paid spend has the highest published prevalence figure, 68%. It means spend credited with conversions the business would have won anyway. The published case highlights do not provide eligible counts or audit level flags to independently reconstruct this percentage.

How much is a typical marketing audit finding worth?

The lower median published annual highlight figure across 74 cases is $58,000, with a range of $31k to $134k. These figures mix outcome types and measurement periods. They do not establish typical realized profit or cash recovery.

Your row is not in this table yet.

Find your number in 5 to 7 working days, every finding tied to your own data. $10k to $50k of findings, or your money back.

Fixed fee. No retainer. NDA first.